ianinfrance wrote:Thanks very much Sue. I'm back home now, so will soon be able to have a good look.
ianinfrance wrote:Yup! The Moroccan egg, to name but one! I was also interested to note that the it was suggested that the slimming days SHOULD be contiguous, which is the opposite of what I've read elsewhere.
ianinfrance wrote:Interesting, Suelle. I wonder why that should have been the case.
Yup, I'm in the same category. I simply don't possess the "satiety switch".Suelle wrote:this is a genetic fault which interferes with the mechanisms by which your brain tells your body is has eaten enough
ianinfrance wrote:Interesting, Suelle. I wonder why that should have been the case.
I don't intend to try them contiguous anyway.
StokeySue wrote:Nice but a few observations
3) No idea why you'd cook it on the hob, I put it in a low oven
Suelle wrote:StokeySue wrote:Nice but a few observations
3) No idea why you'd cook it on the hob, I put it in a low oven
Cooking something on the hob is a cheaper and more efficient use of energy. I often cook stews on the hob, unless long slow cooking is required.
StokeySue wrote:Nice but a few observations
suffolk wrote:Cooking something on the hob will require more liquid that something cooked in the oven - even with a lid on the evaporation is greater when cooking on the hob.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests